From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them in parallel
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002062835.GE31122@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjqsmcma.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:42:10 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > This series (with combo patch attached) implements (much) faster
> > perf-tools feature-auto-detection.
> >
> > I used 3 tricks to implement feature auto-dependencies and to speed up
> > feature detection:
> >
> > - standalone Makefile in config/feature-checks/ built in parallel
> >
> > - split-out standalone .c files in config/feature-checks/*.c
> >
> > - used GCC's auto-dependency generation feature (-MD) to track the
> > effects of system library addition/removal.
>
> I have a memory that this could lead to a nasty build failure. Please
> see the commit b6f4f804108b ("tools lib traceevent: Do not generate
> dependency for system header files").
I think that at least the 'make clean' failure was just a buggy Makefile.
To quote the build error from the commit:
comet:~/tip/tools/lib/traceevent> make clean
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/include/stddef.h', needed by `.trace-seq
It suggests that the 'clean' target depended on .d dependency files -
that's a fundamentally incorrect use of -M/-MD auto-dependencies.
> The problem is that it turned out to depend on some compiler headers
> which are located under some directory with a version number. If so,
> when compiler upgraded to a new version, it cannot find the original
> dependencies so fail to build.
>
> $ cat config/feature-checks/test-libelf.d
> test-libelf: test-libelf.c /usr/include/libelf.h /usr/include/sys/types.h \
> /usr/include/features.h /usr/include/stdc-predef.h \
> /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h /usr/include/bits/wordsize.h \
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h /usr/include/gnu/stubs-64.h \
> /usr/include/bits/types.h /usr/include/bits/typesizes.h \
> /usr/include/time.h \
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.2/include/stddef.h \
> /usr/include/endian.h /usr/include/bits/endian.h \
> /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h /usr/include/bits/byteswap-16.h \
> /usr/include/sys/select.h /usr/include/bits/select.h \
> /usr/include/bits/sigset.h /usr/include/bits/time.h \
> /usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h \
> /usr/include/elf.h \
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.2/include/stdint.h \
> /usr/include/stdint.h /usr/include/bits/wchar.h
>
> In this case we are using this for feature-checking, so I guess it'd
> fail to check the feature after upgrade.
The dependencies are re-made by GCC if a target fails and is rebuilt - and
that should include the new header locations.
I checked out the parent commit (8f7c1d07ade5) which still had full -M,
and this is how it utilized dependencies:
# let .d file also depends on the source and header files
define check_deps
@set -e; $(RM) $@; \
$(CC) -M $(CFLAGS) $< > $@.$$$$; \
sed 's,\($*\)\.o[ :]*,\1.o $@ : ,g' < $@.$$$$ > $@; \
$(RM) $@.$$$$
endef
that's not a very robust method either: .d files should be generated via
-MD not via -M and should be included directly into the Makefile, like I
did it in my patch:
-include *.d */*.d
and the .d files themselves are never added as dependencies - they are
re-made by compilation automatically, not by any explicit Makefile rule.
Adding them as dependencies risks circular dependencies, because the only
method to rebuild a .d file is to actually meet the dependencies of a .c
target.
So if done properly I don't think the build failure cited in that
changelog can trigger.
Now, I cannot vouch for -MD blindly, without having seen a lot more
testing, so we might still be forced to disable or limit that auto-dep
trick, but the reasons cited in b6f4f804108b don't seem to be a GCC bug
but a Makefile bug - they just weren't fully understood back then.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 13:38 [GIT PULL] perf fixes Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 18:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 18:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-12 19:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-12 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 19:58 ` David Ahern
2013-09-12 20:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-12 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-15 9:10 ` [PATCH] perf test-hack: Split out feature tests to cache them and to build them in parallel Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 16:42 ` [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 17:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 17:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 17:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 17:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 17:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 17:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 18:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 17:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-30 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 11:34 ` [PATCH] perf autodep: Remove strlcpy feature check, add __weak strlcpy implementation Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 12:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-10-01 12:51 ` [PATCH] perf autodep: Speed up the 'all features are present' case Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 14:46 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Speed up git-version test on re-make Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 6:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 8:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-01 15:27 ` [PATCH] perf autodep: Remove strlcpy feature check, add __weak strlcpy implementation Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 15:29 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Speed up the final link Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 7:04 ` [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them in parallel Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-01 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 6:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-02 9:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-02 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:18 ` [GIT PULL] perf fixes Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-12 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 21:09 ` David Ahern
2013-09-12 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 22:10 ` David Ahern
2013-09-13 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-13 9:32 ` Jean Pihet
2013-09-13 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-13 17:15 ` Jean Pihet
2013-09-12 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-12 20:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 7:31 ` [PATCH] tools/perf: Fix double/triple-build of the feature detection logic during 'make install' et al Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 9:28 ` [PATCH] tools/perf/build: Automatically build in parallel, based on number of CPUs in the system Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002062835.GE31122@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).