From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:18:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002121834.GB25568@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002115235.GR3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:10:30AM -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Commit-ID: a17bce4d1dce8f3cf714bc2e5d8e4bac009dc077
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a17bce4d1dce8f3cf714bc2e5d8e4bac009dc077
> > Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> > AuthorDate: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:56:24 +0200
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:52:30 +0200
> >
> > x86/boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
> >
> > Turn it into (for example):
> >
> > [ 0.073380] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > [ 0.074005] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
> > [ 0.603005] .... node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15
> > [ 1.200005] .... node #2, CPUs: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23
> > [ 1.796005] .... node #3, CPUs: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31
> > [ 2.393005] .... node #4, CPUs: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39
> > [ 2.996005] .... node #5, CPUs: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47
> > [ 3.600005] .... node #6, CPUs: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55
> > [ 4.202005] .... node #7, CPUs: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63
> > [ 4.811005] .... node #8, CPUs: #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71
> > [ 5.421006] .... node #9, CPUs: #72 #73 #74 #75 #76 #77 #78 #79
> > [ 6.032005] .... node #10, CPUs: #80 #81 #82 #83 #84 #85 #86 #87
> > [ 6.648006] .... node #11, CPUs: #88 #89 #90 #91 #92 #93 #94 #95
> > [ 7.262005] .... node #12, CPUs: #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103
> > [ 7.865005] .... node #13, CPUs: #104 #105 #106 #107 #108 #109 #110 #111
> > [ 8.466005] .... node #14, CPUs: #112 #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 #118 #119
> > [ 9.073006] .... node #15, CPUs: #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127
> > [ 9.679901] x86: Booted up 16 nodes, 128 CPUs
> >
>
> [ 0.314494] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors # 1[ 0.333365] NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
> # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 OK
> [ 0.398473] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 OK
> [ 0.565198] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors # 12 # 13 # 14 # 15 # 16 # 17 OK
> [ 0.654558] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors # 18 # 19 # 20 # 21 # 22 # 23 OK
> [ 0.743527] Brought up 24 CPUs
That's not how it looks like here:
[ 0.369572] NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
[ 0.377957] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 0.382294] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3
[ 0.428340] .... node #1, CPUs: #4 #5 #6 #7
[ 0.564304] .... node #2, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11
[ 0.700242] .... node #3, CPUs: #12 #13 #14 #15
[ 0.836819] x86: Booted up 4 nodes, 16 CPUs
[ 0.841487] smpboot: Total of 16 processors activated (73944.72 BogoMIPS)
and:
[ 0.304732] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 0.326682] NMI watchdog: enabled on all CPUs, permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
[ 0.309034] .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
[ 0.417810] .... node #1, CPUs: #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15
[ 0.608563] x86: Booted up 2 nodes, 16 CPUs
[ 0.613169] smpboot: Total of 16 processors activated (89598.99 BogoMIPS)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 10:57 [PATCH] x86, smpboot: fix announce_cpu() to print the last OK Libin
2013-09-05 17:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly tip-bot for Libin
2013-09-25 10:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-25 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 23:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 6:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 10:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, alternatives: Drop ancient lockdep fixup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 8:28 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, x86/alternatives: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 13:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 17:47 ` [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 18:04 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:36 ` [PATCH -v1.3] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:42 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-28 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29 9:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:17 ` [PATCH -v1.4] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:44 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-30 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 9:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-01 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 9:10 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-10-02 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-02 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58 ` [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 5:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29 2:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Mike Galbraith
2013-09-28 8:28 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 4:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-09-27 12:48 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 13:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002121834.GB25568@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).