From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Chris Murphy <bugzilla@colorremedies.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
khali@linux-fr.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:24:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002172410.GA381@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002164718.GA7392@roeck-us.net>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:47:18AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:34:18PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > > >>One thing I have seen in all logs is the earlier "send_byte fail" message, so
> > > >>I think that is a pre-requisite.
> > > >
> > > >Not necessarily - it could be that the patch actually fixes the root
> > > >cause. One possible scenario is that on recent SMCs, some of the
> > > >commands produce more data than we actually read. This would
> > > >eventually lead to both data corruption and overflow somwhere in the
> > > >SMC internals. If the original SMC error is interpreted as a read
> > > >buffer overflow, then that problem should be fixed with this patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Good point.
> > >
> > > But shouldn't we at least get the "flushed %d bytes" warning message in this case ?
> >
> > The explanation I have there is that the (newer) SMC needs the
> > application to read the 'no more bytes' or it will get confused. It
> > makes sense, if the number of bytes to read is no longer specified.
> >
> You mean that just reading from APPLESMC_CMD_PORT would solve the problem ?
> That might make sense.
It also points at the possibility of a smaller patch to test, but I
have not had the time to check this very deeply myself:
Thanks,
Henrik
>From 4451da32414080bd0563ee9e061f19bf90463cc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:15:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] applesmc remedy take 2
Conjectured problem: there are remnant bytes ready on the data line
which corrupts the read after a failure.
Remedy: assuming bit0 is the read valid line, try to flush it before
starting a new command.
Tests by Chris suggests reading the status is enough for the problem
to go away, which is consistent with a change in the SMC interface,
where the number of bytes to read is no longer specified, but found
out by reading until end of data.
Tested on a MacBookAir3,1, but the original problem has not been
reproduced.
---
drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
index 98814d1..c0ff350 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static int send_argument(const char *key)
static int read_smc(u8 cmd, const char *key, u8 *buffer, u8 len)
{
+ u8 status, data;
int i;
if (send_command(cmd) || send_argument(key)) {
@@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ static int read_smc(u8 cmd, const char *key, u8 *buffer, u8 len)
return -EIO;
}
+ /* This has no effect on newer (2012) SMCs */
if (send_byte(len, APPLESMC_DATA_PORT)) {
pr_warn("%.4s: read len fail\n", key);
return -EIO;
@@ -250,6 +252,17 @@ static int read_smc(u8 cmd, const char *key, u8 *buffer, u8 len)
buffer[i] = inb(APPLESMC_DATA_PORT);
}
+ /* Read the data port until bit0 is cleared */
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
+ udelay(APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT);
+ status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
+ if (!(status & 0x01))
+ break;
+ data = inb(APPLESMC_DATA_PORT);
+ }
+ if (i)
+ pr_warn("flushed %d bytes, last value is: %d\n", i, data);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.8.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 19:06 applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11 Josh Boyer
2013-09-25 19:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-25 21:48 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-09-25 22:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-26 6:34 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-09-26 10:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-26 11:13 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-09-26 10:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-26 11:11 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-09-27 16:21 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-27 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-27 17:41 ` Chris Murphy
2013-09-27 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-27 18:03 ` Chris Murphy
2013-09-27 23:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-01 1:57 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-01 3:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-01 10:55 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-10-01 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-01 15:33 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-01 16:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 1:09 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-02 3:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 3:55 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-02 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 9:53 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-10-02 13:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 16:34 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-10-02 16:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 17:24 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2013-10-02 18:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 18:33 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-02 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-02 21:34 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-02 23:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-07 23:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-07 23:46 ` Chris Murphy
2013-10-08 15:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-08 16:29 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-10-08 16:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09 8:29 ` Henrik Rydberg
2013-10-09 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-27 18:01 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002172410.GA381@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=bugzilla@colorremedies.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox