From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:41:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002150518.675931976@infradead.org>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> It is functionally equivalent to
>
> struct xxx_struct {
> atomic_t counter;
> };
>
> static inline bool xxx_is_idle(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> return atomic_read(&xxx->counter) == 0;
> }
>
> static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> atomic_inc(&xxx->counter);
> synchronize_sched();
> }
>
> static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
> {
> synchronize_sched();
> atomic_dec(&xxx->counter);
> }
>
> except: it records the state and synchronize_sched() is only called by
> xxx_enter() and only if necessary.
Could you please make the "xxx_" above match the prefix below?
One comment below for the code's self-defense.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130929183634.GA15563@redhat.com
> ---
> include/linux/rcusync.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/Makefile | 3 -
> kernel/rcusync.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +#define _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +
> +struct rcu_sync_struct {
> + int gp_state;
> + int gp_count;
> + wait_queue_head_t gp_wait;
> +
> + int cb_state;
> + struct rcu_head cb_head;
> +
> + void (*sync)(void);
> + void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
> +};
> +
> +#define ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) \
> + .gp_state = 0, \
> + .gp_count = 0, \
> + .gp_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.gp_wait), \
> + .cb_state = 0
> +
> +#define __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_sched, \
> + .call = call_rcu_sched, \
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_rcu_bh, \
> + .call = call_rcu_bh, \
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
> + ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
> + .sync = synchronize_rcu, \
> + .call = call_rcu, \
> +}
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SCHED_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_BH_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SYNC(name) \
> + struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
It would be nice to validate that we are in the corresponding type of
RCU read-side critical section, but I would hate to pay a function call
through a pointer for this if !PROVE_RCU. But even more, I would hate
rare bugs due to someone forgetting an rcu_read_lock().
How about the something like the following, where ->read_side_check()
gets rcu_read_lock_held(), rcu_read_lock_bh_held(), or
rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), as appropriate?
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) BUG_ON(!rss->read_side_check())
#else
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) do { } while (0)
#endif
rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss);
> + return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
> +}
> +
> +enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
> +
> +extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
> +extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_ */
> +
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-y = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
> kthread.o wait.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
> hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
> notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> - async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
> + async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o \
> + rcusync.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> # Do not trace debug files and internal ftrace files
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +
> +#include <linux/rcusync.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +enum { GP_IDLE = 0, GP_PENDING, GP_PASSED };
> +enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
> +
> +#define rss_lock gp_wait.lock
> +
> +void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
> +{
> + memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
> + init_waitqueue_head(&rss->gp_wait);
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case RCU_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_rcu;
> + rss->call = call_rcu;
> + break;
> +
> + case RCU_SCHED_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_sched;
> + rss->call = call_rcu_sched;
> + break;
> +
> + case RCU_BH_SYNC:
> + rss->sync = synchronize_rcu_bh;
> + rss->call = call_rcu_bh;
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> + bool need_wait, need_sync;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> + need_wait = rss->gp_count++;
> + need_sync = rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;
> + if (need_sync)
> + rss->gp_state = GP_PENDING;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +
> + BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
> +
> + if (need_sync) {
> + rss->sync();
> + rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
> + wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
> + } else if (need_wait) {
> + wait_event(rss->gp_wait, rss->gp_state == GP_PASSED);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Possible when there's a pending CB from a rcu_sync_exit().
> + * Nobody has yet been allowed the 'fast' path and thus we can
> + * avoid doing any sync(). The callback will get 'dropped'.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> + struct rcu_sync_struct *rss =
> + container_of(rcu, struct rcu_sync_struct, cb_head);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> +
> + BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> + BUG_ON(rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> + if (rss->gp_count) {
> + /*
> + * A new rcu_sync_begin() has happened; drop the callback.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> + } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY) {
> + /*
> + * A new rcu_sync_exit() has happened; requeue the callback
> + * to catch a later GP.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> + rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now
> + * have observed the write side critical section. Let 'em rip!.
> + */
> + rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> + rss->gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> + if (!--rss->gp_count) {
> + if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
> + rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> + rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> + } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
> + rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +}
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 14:56 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-10-03 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 20:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 21:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 11:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 7:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 12:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 15:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 20:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-04 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] hotplug: Optimize cpu_hotplug_{begin,done}() using rcu_sync Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).