linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:41:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002150518.675931976@infradead.org>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> 
> It is functionally equivalent to
> 
>         struct xxx_struct {
>                 atomic_t counter;
>         };
> 
>         static inline bool xxx_is_idle(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 return atomic_read(&xxx->counter) == 0;
>         }
> 
>         static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 atomic_inc(&xxx->counter);
>                 synchronize_sched();
>         }
> 
>         static inline void xxx_enter(struct xxx_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 synchronize_sched();
>                 atomic_dec(&xxx->counter);
>         }
> 
> except: it records the state and synchronize_sched() is only called by
> xxx_enter() and only if necessary.

Could you please make the "xxx_" above match the prefix below?

One comment below for the code's self-defense.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130929183634.GA15563@redhat.com
> ---
>  include/linux/rcusync.h |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/Makefile         |    3 -
>  kernel/rcusync.c        |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +#define _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +
> +struct rcu_sync_struct {
> +	int			gp_state;
> +	int			gp_count;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	gp_wait;
> +
> +	int			cb_state;
> +	struct rcu_head		cb_head;
> +
> +	void (*sync)(void);
> +	void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
> +};
> +
> +#define ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)						\
> +	.gp_state = 0,							\
> +	.gp_count = 0,							\
> +	.gp_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.gp_wait),		\
> +	.cb_state = 0
> +
> +#define __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name) {					\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_sched,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu_sched,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name) {					\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_rcu_bh,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu_bh,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) {						\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_rcu,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SCHED_SYNC(name)					\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_BH_SYNC(name)					\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SYNC(name)						\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{

It would be nice to validate that we are in the corresponding type of
RCU read-side critical section, but I would hate to pay a function call
through a pointer for this if !PROVE_RCU.  But even more, I would hate
rare bugs due to someone forgetting an rcu_read_lock().

How about the something like the following, where ->read_side_check()
gets rcu_read_lock_held(), rcu_read_lock_bh_held(), or
rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), as appropriate?

#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) BUG_ON(!rss->read_side_check())
#else
#define rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss) do { } while (0)
#endif

	rcu_sync_is_idle_check(rss);

> +	return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
> +}
> +
> +enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
> +
> +extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
> +extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_ */
> +
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-y     = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
>  	    kthread.o wait.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
>  	    hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
>  	    notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> -	    async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
> +	    async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o \
> +	    rcusync.o
> 
>  ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
>  # Do not trace debug files and internal ftrace files
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +
> +#include <linux/rcusync.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +enum { GP_IDLE = 0, GP_PENDING, GP_PASSED };
> +enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
> +
> +#define	rss_lock	gp_wait.lock
> +
> +void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
> +{
> +	memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&rss->gp_wait);
> +
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case RCU_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_rcu;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case RCU_SCHED_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_sched;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu_sched;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case RCU_BH_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_rcu_bh;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu_bh;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> +	bool need_wait, need_sync;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +	need_wait = rss->gp_count++;
> +	need_sync = rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;
> +	if (need_sync)
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_PENDING;
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +
> +	BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
> +
> +	if (need_sync) {
> +		rss->sync();
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
> +		wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
> +	} else if (need_wait) {
> +		wait_event(rss->gp_wait, rss->gp_state == GP_PASSED);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Possible when there's a pending CB from a rcu_sync_exit().
> +		 * Nobody has yet been allowed the 'fast' path and thus we can
> +		 * avoid doing any sync(). The callback will get 'dropped'.
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct *rss =
> +		container_of(rcu, struct rcu_sync_struct, cb_head);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +
> +	BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> +	BUG_ON(rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +	if (rss->gp_count) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A new rcu_sync_begin() has happened; drop the callback.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> +	} else if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A new rcu_sync_exit() has happened; requeue the callback
> +		 * to catch a later GP.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> +		rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now
> +		 * have observed the write side critical section. Let 'em rip!.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +	if (!--rss->gp_count) {
> +		if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
> +			rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> +			rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +		} else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
> +			rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +}
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-03 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-02 14:56 [PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 14:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:27     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 16:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 15:49   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 16:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08  8:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:41   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-10-03 17:00     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 17:15       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:47       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:21         ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:32           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:33             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 19:50               ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 20:00                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 21:10                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-03 22:00                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 11:29                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:22                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04  7:18                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:15                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:36                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 11:50                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 11:44                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 12:13                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 12:38                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 13:31                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 14:43                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 15:13                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 16:25                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:06                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:41                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:31                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04  7:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 20:14       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-04  7:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 14:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] hotplug: Optimize cpu_hotplug_{begin,done}() using rcu_sync Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 16:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 18:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 18:46       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-03 19:05       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131003164117.GD5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).