From: Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>
To: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@gmail.com>
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, snitzer@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, david@fromorbit.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
joe@perches.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, m.chehab@samsung.com,
ejt@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, cesarb@cesarb.net
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] dm-writeboost testing
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:03:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004150313.GB25523@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524D70DA.8040308@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
> > dm-cache doesn't have this problem, if you overwrite the same piece of
> > data again and again, it goes to the cache device.
>
> It is not a bug but should/can be optimized.
>
> Below is the cache hit path for writes.
> writeboost performs very poorly when a partial write hits
> which then turns `needs_cleanup_perv_cache` to true.
Are you using fixed size blocks for caching then? The whole point of
using a journal/log based disk layout for caching is you can slurp up
all writes irrespective of their size.
What are the scenarios where you out perform dm-cache?
- Joe
> Partial write hits is believed to be unlikely so
> I decided to give up this path to make other likely-paths optimized.
> I think this is just a tradeoff issue of what to be optimized the most.
>
> if (found) {
>
> if (unlikely(on_buffer)) {
> mutex_unlock(&cache->io_lock);
>
> update_mb_idx = mb->idx;
> goto write_on_buffer;
> } else {
> u8 dirty_bits = atomic_read_mb_dirtiness(seg, mb);
>
> /*
> * First clean up the previous cache
> * and migrate the cache if needed.
> */
> bool needs_cleanup_prev_cache =
> !bio_fullsize || !(dirty_bits == 255);
>
> if (unlikely(needs_cleanup_prev_cache)) {
> wait_for_completion(&seg->flush_done);
> migrate_mb(cache, seg, mb, dirty_bits, true);
> }
>
> I checked that the mkfs.ext4 writes only in 4KB size
> so it is not gonna turn the boolean value true for going into the slowpath.
>
> Problem:
> Problem is that
> it chooses the slowpath even though the bio is full-sized overwrite
> in the test.
>
> The reason is that the dirty bits is sometimes seen as 0
> and the suspect is the migration daemon.
>
> I guess you created the writeboost device with the default configuration.
> In that case migration daemon always works and
> some metadata is cleaned up in background.
>
> If you turns both enable_migration_modulator and allow_migrate to 0
> before beginning the test
> to stop migration at all
> it never goes into the slowpath with the test.
>
> Solution:
> Changing the code to
> avoid going into the slowpath when the dirty bits is zero
> will solve this problem.
>
> And done. Please pull the latest one from the repo.
> --- a/Driver/dm-writeboost-target.c
> +++ b/Driver/dm-writeboost-target.c
> @@ -688,6 +688,14 @@ static int writeboost_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio
> bool needs_cleanup_prev_cache =
> !bio_fullsize || !(dirty_bits == 255);
>
> + /*
> + * Migration works in background
> + * and may have cleaned up the metablock.
> + * If the metablock is clean we need not to migrate.
> + */
> + if (!dirty_bits)
> + needs_cleanup_prev_cache = false;
> +
> if (unlikely(needs_cleanup_prev_cache)) {
> wait_for_completion(&seg->flush_done);
> migrate_mb(cache, seg, mb, dirty_bits, true);
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-03 0:15 dm-writeboost testing Mikulas Patocka
2013-10-03 13:27 ` [dm-devel] " Akira Hayakawa
2013-10-04 15:03 ` Joe Thornber [this message]
2013-10-04 2:28 ` Akira Hayakawa
2013-10-04 13:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-10-04 14:25 ` Akira Hayakawa
2013-10-04 15:56 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-10-05 7:05 ` Akira Hayakawa
2013-10-06 0:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-10-06 2:14 ` Akira Hayakawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131004150313.GB25523@debian \
--to=thornber@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cesarb@cesarb.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=ruby.wktk@gmail.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).