From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753556Ab3JDSx1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:53:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60667 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753360Ab3JDSx0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:53:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:46:14 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Paul McKenney , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Message-ID: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On top of Peter's "[PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking" series. It seems that Paul and Peter agree with 1-3, and they are simple. 4-5 should be ignored without the explicit ack. Peter seems to dislike the exclusive mode. I disagree but I am not going to argue. (well, at least right now ;) Oleg. include/linux/rcusync.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- kernel/rcusync.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)