From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] rcusync: add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004184633.GA17557@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com>
It would be nice to validate that the caller of rcu_sync_is_idle()
holds the corresponding type of RCU read-side lock. Add the new
rcu_sync_ops->held() method and change rcu_sync_is_idle() to
WARN() if it returns false.
This obviously penalizes the readers (fast-path), but only if
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.
Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/rcusync.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/rcusync.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcusync.h b/include/linux/rcusync.h
index 30c6037..ab787c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcusync.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
struct rcu_sync_ops {
void (*sync)(void);
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+ int (*held)(void);
+#endif
};
struct rcu_sync_struct {
@@ -22,6 +25,9 @@ struct rcu_sync_struct {
static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+ WARN_ON(!rss->ops->held());
+#endif
return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcusync.c b/kernel/rcusync.c
index 1cefb83..21cde9b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcusync.c
+++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
@@ -6,18 +6,27 @@ enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
#define rss_lock gp_wait.lock
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
+#define __INIT_HELD(func) .held = func,
+#else
+#define __INIT_HELD(func)
+#endif
+
struct rcu_sync_ops rcu_sync_ops_array[] = {
[RCU_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu,
.call = call_rcu,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_held)
},
[RCU_SCHED_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_sched,
.call = call_rcu_sched,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_sched_held)
},
[RCU_BH_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu_bh,
.call = call_rcu_bh,
+ __INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_bh_held)
},
};
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-04 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] rcusync: introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-04 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-05 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_struct->exclusive mode Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-06 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-07 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcusync: make rcu_sync_enter() return "bool" Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 21:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-05 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131004184633.GA17557@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).