From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_dtor()
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:46:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004184636.GA17560@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com>
Add the new rcu_sync_ops->wait() method and the new helper,
rcu_sync_dtor().
It is needed if you are going to, say, kfree(rcu_sync_object).
It simply calls ops->wait() to "flush" the potentially pending
rcu callback.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/rcusync.h | 2 ++
kernel/rcusync.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcusync.h b/include/linux/rcusync.h
index ab787c1..33864a0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcusync.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
struct rcu_sync_ops {
void (*sync)(void);
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
+ void (*wait)(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
int (*held)(void);
#endif
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
+extern void rcu_sync_dtor(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
extern struct rcu_sync_ops rcu_sync_ops_array[];
diff --git a/kernel/rcusync.c b/kernel/rcusync.c
index 21cde9b..bb311eb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcusync.c
+++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
@@ -16,16 +16,19 @@ struct rcu_sync_ops rcu_sync_ops_array[] = {
[RCU_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu,
.call = call_rcu,
+ .wait = rcu_barrier,
__INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_held)
},
[RCU_SCHED_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_sched,
.call = call_rcu_sched,
+ .wait = rcu_barrier_sched,
__INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_sched_held)
},
[RCU_BH_SYNC] = {
.sync = synchronize_rcu_bh,
.call = call_rcu_bh,
+ .wait = rcu_barrier_bh,
__INIT_HELD(rcu_read_lock_bh_held)
},
};
@@ -113,3 +116,21 @@ void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
}
spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
}
+
+void rcu_sync_dtor(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
+{
+ int cb_state;
+
+ BUG_ON(rss->gp_count);
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+ if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY)
+ rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
+ cb_state = rss->cb_state;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+
+ if (cb_state != CB_IDLE) {
+ rss->ops->wait();
+ BUG_ON(rss->cb_state != CB_IDLE);
+ }
+}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-04 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] rcusync: introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-04 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-05 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] rcusync: add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_struct->exclusive mode Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-06 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-07 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcusync: make rcu_sync_enter() return "bool" Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 21:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-05 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131004184636.GA17560@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).