From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752826Ab3JER3j (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:29:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14480 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751525Ab3JER3i (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:29:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:22:34 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul McKenney , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Message-ID: <20131005172234.GB18191@redhat.com> References: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com> <20131004193203.GV15690@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131004193203.GV15690@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > shall I pick them up and stuff them through tip > with the rest of the lot? This would be great, thanks. > > 4-5 should be ignored without the explicit ack. Peter seems to > > dislike the exclusive mode. I disagree but I am not going to argue. > > (well, at least right now ;) > > Lets have another few rounds of email on that one; maybe I'll get used > to it :-) OK ;) I'll send v2 anyway. Oleg.