From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753708Ab3JGVVi (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:21:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:57275 "EHLO mail-lb0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477Ab3JGVVf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:21:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:21:33 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Pavel Emelyanov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] smaps: show VM_SOFTDIRTY flag in VmFlags line Message-ID: <20131007212133.GL6036@moon> References: <1380913335-17466-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <5252B56C.8030903@parallels.com> <1381155304-2ro6e10t-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1381155304-2ro6e10t-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:15:04AM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > > > The comment is not correct. Per-VMA soft-dirty flag means, that > > VMA is "newly created" one and thus represents a new (dirty) are > > in task's VM. > > Thanks for the correction. I changed the description. Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov