From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [xen] double fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:35:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008033518.GA9401@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwBVx0D=7b4+-PgnZ+uEBW9suNF8e-QCegme375N5yyYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:29:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I see no timer usage in parport_pc driver, so it's still questionable.
>
> The timer itself comes simply from the delayed_work that is used to
> delay the freeing of the kobject.
>
> So that is not the surprising part.
OK.
> The surprising part is that I don't see parport_pc doing anything
> odd/bad with its kobject embedded in the 'struct dev'. It seems to
> just do a platform_device_register_simple() followed by a
> platform_device_unregister().
>
> At least that's true for the normal parport_pc_probe_port() case that
> just passes in a NULL dev... But I only glanced at the driver, so I
> might have missed something.
>
> > with some manual bisects, I find a good config (attached) that can
> > reliably boot the kernel up.
> >
> > Based on that config, I tried adding parport_pc and see that it still
> > boots fine.
> >
> > Adding drm, however will bring back the oops. Will try a kernel based
> > on the original kconfig with drm disabled only.
FYI I just confirmed that the original bad kconfig can be made
bootable by simply disabling CONFIG_DRM.
> Ok. The list corruption (which also pointed at parport_pc) might well
> be corrupted by removing the entries before or after the parport_pc,
> and moving the corruption to parport_pc that way (through the
> "prev->next = next" thing in list handling). So maybe it was something
> else all along. You could enable CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST to see if that
> triggers some dump earlier..
OK, I'll try enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-06 8:23 [xen] double fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Fengguang Wu
2013-10-06 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-07 2:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07 5:10 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-07 8:12 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20131007083505.GA22585@localhost>
2013-10-07 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-07 22:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-07 23:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-07 23:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 2:09 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 2:14 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 2:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 3:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 3:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 3:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 3:35 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-10-08 4:35 ` [DRM_CURRUS_QEMU/timer] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at debug_print_object() Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 12:17 ` [xen] double fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 22:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-08 22:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-09 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-09 1:18 ` Dave Jones
2013-10-09 1:26 ` [PATCH] kobject: show debug info on delayed kobject release Fengguang Wu
2013-10-09 14:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-09 14:12 ` [xen] double fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Josh Boyer
2013-10-09 0:46 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 8:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-10 2:23 ` Dave Airlie
2013-10-10 2:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-10 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-10 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-11 3:55 ` Dave Airlie
2013-10-11 4:28 ` Dave Airlie
2013-10-11 5:14 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-23 11:20 ` Xiong Zhou
2013-10-08 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-08 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-08 8:20 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-10-08 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-08 9:34 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-06 22:14 Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008033518.GA9401@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).