From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756355Ab3JHTuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:50:16 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44034 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896Ab3JHTuO (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:50:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:50:13 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes Message-Id: <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20131008090019.527108154@gmail.com> References: <20131008090019.527108154@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:00:19 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Hi! Here is a couple of fixes for soft dirty pages tracking. > While first two patches are adressing issues, the last one > is rather a cleanup which I've been asked to implement long > ago, but I'm not sure if anyone picked it up. > Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable? I already have patch 3, as arch-x86-mnify-pte_to_pgoff-and-pgoff_to_pte-helpers.patch (with s/m/u). I've queued it for transmission to the x86 guys.