From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757086Ab3JIMIH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:08:07 -0400
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38253 "EHLO
	merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751735Ab3JIMIE (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:08:04 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:07:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/8] perf tools: kcore improvements
Message-ID: <20131009120744.GF3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1381320078-16497-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1381320078-16497-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:01:10PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> 	- workaround objdump difficulties with kcore

I've no idea, but given that've 'inlined' addr2line, should we also
consider polling in objdump -- or at least that subset of functionality
that we actually use?