From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.11.4: kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1268
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:23:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131009172336.GH13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131009151853.GA25608@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> This is really weird. We are delivering a signal to a task. While task is
ITYM "a fatal signal"
> returning from kernel space we are running queued task works and one of
get_signal_to_deliver() notices that the signal has to be dealt with
via default reaction, which happens to be "die, you bastard". So it
calls do_group_exit(). Which means that we'll never be returning to userland,
so the time to run pending __fput() is now.
> that works is dropping last file reference. Ext4 then does some data
> flushing and at that point we find out irqs are disabled. It isn't really
> clear to me where in that call chain got irqs disabled. I went through it
> and didn't find any such place... If this is reproducible, there would be
> ways to debug this (like irq tracing). Otherwise I'm not sure... I'm CCing
> Al since he was digging in this code recently. Maybe he will have some
> idea.
Note that do_group_exit() is preceded by
spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
so no matter what happened in callers, irq is enabled. I'd suggest sticking
such BUG_ON() into __fput() and trying to reproduce that crap...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-09 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 11:55 3.11.4: kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1268 George Spelvin
2013-10-09 15:18 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-09 17:23 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-10-17 21:11 ` George Spelvin
2013-10-17 21:31 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-31 9:58 ` George Spelvin
2013-10-31 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-31 16:30 ` George Spelvin
2013-10-31 20:37 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-31 20:43 ` Jan Kara
2013-11-01 0:50 ` George Spelvin
2013-11-28 5:09 ` George Spelvin
2013-11-28 15:34 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-10 9:35 ` George Spelvin
2013-12-10 15:27 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-10 16:21 ` Jan Kara
2013-12-11 0:57 ` George Spelvin
2013-10-17 22:14 ` Al Viro
2013-10-31 18:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-31 19:43 ` George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131009172336.GH13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).