Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9

Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09T17:55:44Z

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:44:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> > > repository below:
> > >
> > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
> > >
> > > A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86, ARM, PowerPC and
> > > MIPS default configurations build fine. There were some build failures
> > > unrelated to the merge, most of which I fixed and added as patches on
> > > top of the final merge.
> > >
> > Build results:
> > total: 110 pass: 93 skipped: 4 fail: 13
> > [3.12-rc4: total: 110 pass: 105 skipped: 3 fail: 2]
> >
> > Failed builds:
> > alpha:allmodconfig
> > arm:allmodconfig
> > blackfin:defconfig
> > i386:allyesconfig
> > i386:allmodconfig
> > m68k:allmodconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> > mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
> > powerpc:allmodconfig
> > sparc64:allmodconfig
> > x86_64:allmodconfig
> > x86_64:allyesconfig
> > xtensa:allmodconfig
> >
> > Many of the failures are due to ceph:
> >
> > fs/ceph/file.c: In function 'ceph_sync_read':
> > fs/ceph/file.c:437:25: error: 'struct iov_iter' has no member named 'iov'
> > ...
> >
> Sorry, that was the result for yesterday's tree. I should have results for the
> October 9 tree in a couple of hours.
>
October 9 results are exactly the same.

Guenter