From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:02:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131015060200.GA3866@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381805731-10398-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com>
* David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> + /* for MMAP based file writes */
> + void *mmap_addr;
> + u64 bytes_at_mmap_start; /* bytes in file when mmap use starts */
> + u64 mmap_offset; /* current location within mmap */
> + size_t mmap_size; /* size of mmap segments */
> + bool use_mmap;
> + if (!rec->opts.pipe_output && stat(output_name, &st) == 0) {
> + rec->use_mmap = true;
> + rec->bytes_at_mmap_start = st.st_size - rec->bytes_written;
> + }
1)
I think __cmd_record() has become way too large, nearly 300 lines of code.
It would be nice to split it into 2-3 helpers that operate on 'struct
perf_record' or so.
2)
The stat() seems superfluous, here in __cmd_record() we've just checked
the output_name and made sure it exists. Can that stat() call ever fail?
3)
The rec->bytes_at_mmap_start field feels a bit weird. If I read the code
correctly, in every 'perf record' invocation, rec->bytes_written starts at
0 - i.e. we don't have repeat invocations of cmd_record().
That means that this:
rec->bytes_at_mmap_start = st.st_size - rec->bytes_written;
is really:
rec->bytes_at_mmap_start = st.st_size;
furthermore, since we don't allow appends anymore, st.st_size ought to be
zero as well.
Which means that ->bytes_at_mmap_start is always zero - and could be
eliminated altogether.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 2:55 [PATCH] perf record: mmap output file - v2 David Ahern
2013-10-15 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-15 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 8:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 12:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 13:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 13:25 ` David Ahern
2013-10-16 1:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-15 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 13:45 ` David Ahern
2013-10-15 13:35 ` David Ahern
2013-10-16 1:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-16 1:58 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131015060200.GA3866@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox