From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760346Ab3JPKFV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:05:21 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:48069 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760044Ab3JPKFT (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:05:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,506,1378882800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="411811123" Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:50:30 -0400 From: Chen Gong To: "Naveen N. Rao" Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, m.chehab@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver Message-ID: <20131016095030.GA8954@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Naveen N. Rao" , tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, m.chehab@samsung.com References: <1381473166-29303-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1381473166-29303-9-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131015165435.GA2777@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131015165435.GA2777@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: A43922C7 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:35PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:24:35 +0530 > From: "Naveen N. Rao" > To: "Chen, Gong" > Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, m.chehab@samsung.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) >=20 > On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote: > > Use trace interface to elaborate all H/W error related > > information. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong > > --- > > > +TRACE_EVENT(extlog_mem_event, > > + TP_PROTO(u32 etype, > > + char *dimm_loc, > > + const uuid_le *fru_id, > > + char *fru_text, > > + u64 error_count, > > + u32 severity, > > + u64 phy_addr, > > + char *mem_loc), >=20 > [Adding Mauro...] >=20 > This looks very similar to the trace event I wrote a while back, > which was similar to the one provided by ghes_edac: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/24616 >=20 > Seems to me this has the same issues we previously discussed w.r.t > EDAC conflicts... >=20 This thread is so long. I have to say I'm lost ... Anyway, it looks like there are many different opnions on this last patch. I will send the 2nd version for further discussion soon. --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSXmFmAAoJEI01n1+kOSLHNwEP/RhFooLMsOOoHRdsbgPkldNT gBKm6v61kAIjsnKuJqktkG2yYw227sUkHNn+83B8pskFWoUxBrbrIuhlrVM8zpom Ne3FixMo+GPeqsaVn7XFEgNOfCHmf0V31kbOcYay7PC5W/jURxf1ExRgL5BU+cyv ZwgqaFdbPTpA1EUHsHzm/zlvXEpQnf+1HYwDPqIg8e3c4CTIfB2wDL4jKnVBu7CD CyRF8q25rFAD0LHEOz/0fLwvUHd8zZtkRMqOdVUlmJ+W/oSOfru6BWI4Of7GZgRT j4uWoAfRvT7TVM6SyxxRD3RNg5nhraFJgup+rO4wnlUW7PXFnY/21jtfBPcK18H/ ayxRNr01Z+uzRtB3C4sUrorJvwez3ZHeuKdgyOH5rsyr6+tNHFHegQkC/6VWeiH+ mHqXZA5ixGQw/bs7nlXJI5JMle/3xJEfhfUqo2XfXSN4UH9spcwIeyM/5/xk0X7A dRxEQzAmn3TfFUwUc5cCBWtqmbskwdpqdM2pk22/iAi7h26pHHlxfkY1zZvQqcYL e+k+nk/84WR7kCOonbECvNqSRuku+9PIyYdPVr12d21bcwnoBOaSQhZTNWXHq0GK pRs7WDHl1SmvFE2dLqirA8fnqMoWjkPHj85DC71L87i8xBRJjBBXvS1qz49pLIuZ e83iSq1rhES88SVGMf6u =zPHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--