From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Martin Cermak <mcermak@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: fix fork() with the pending ret-probe(s)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131016173828.GA31347@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131014182903.GA14115@redhat.com>
On 10/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 10/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Please review, this series fixes the serious bug reported by
> > Martin and David and cc's stable. See the changelog in 5/5.
OK, nobody seems to object, I am going to ask Ingo to pull this fix.
But,
> This probably needs another patch to handle the special case, vfork().
> In this case it would be more correct to dup return_instances but
> (obviously) avoid dup_xol_area.
>
> However I think this is not that important, the child should not "unwind"
> the stack if it shares mm/stack with its parent, otherwise it can corrupt
> the parent's stack.
Yes, but I forgot that at least the child should return from vfork()
itself and it can be ret-probed.
So I am sending the additional 6/5 in reply to 0/5. This change can
be joined with 1/5, but I'd prefer to do this in a separate patch for
better documentation.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-13 19:18 [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: fix fork() with the pending ret-probe(s) Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-13 19:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: Change the callsite of uprobe_copy_process() Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-16 12:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-13 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: Introduce __create_xol_area() Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-16 12:41 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-16 12:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-13 19:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: Teach __create_xol_area() to accept the predefined vaddr Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-16 12:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-13 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: Change uprobe_copy_process() to dup return_instances Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-14 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-14 19:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-16 12:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-13 19:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: Change uprobe_copy_process() to dup xol_area Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-14 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-14 14:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-14 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 12:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-16 16:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-18 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-14 18:29 ` [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: fix fork() with the pending ret-probe(s) Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-16 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-10-16 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/5] uprobes: Teach uprobe_copy_process() to handle CLONE_VFORK Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131016173828.GA31347@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcermak@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).