public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] x86-64: properly handle FPU code/data selectors
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:23:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131017102354.GR15657@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525FCF5802000078000FBC04@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.10.13 at 11:41, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 17.10.13 at 11:27, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:13:40PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> > It preserves *less* state, because the upper 32 bits of rip are now
> >> >> > corrupted. Any 64-bit application that actually looks at the FP
> >> >> > rip/rdp fields now get the WRONG VALUES.
> >> >> 
> >> >> But again - this isn't being done for ordinary 64-bit applications,
> >> >> this is only happening for KVM guests. And there not being a
> >> >> protocol for telling the caller whether a certain context hold
> >> >> 64-bit offsets or selector/offset pairs shouldn't be a reason to
> >> >> think of a solution to the problem.
> >> >> 
> >> > KVM knows what mode guest vcpu is in. is_long_mode(vcpu) will tell you
> >> > if it is in long mode or not. No need to guess it.
> >> 
> >> So what if that 64-bit guest OS is running a 32-bit app? You can
> >> only positively know the _current_ guest word size when the
> >> guest is not in long mode.
> >> 
> > KVM obviously knows the complete state of virtual CPU. It can figure the
> > situation above by looking at CS descriptor, not need to check
> > is_long_mode() at all. Here is how emulator does it:
> 
> And again - no: The last floating point operation may have
> happened in 32-bit user mode context, while the state saving
> may happen when the guest is already back in 64-bit kernel
> mode.
> 
Hmm, OK so the scenarios you are talking about is:
 1. Guest's 32bit process uses FPU
 2. Guest switch to 64bit kernel.
 3. Before guest's kernel saves 32bit process's FPU state VMEXIT happens
 4. KVM need to save FPU but it does not know what mode it is in
Correct? 

KVM gives FPU to a guest lazily, meaning that on a first FPU use #NM
(intercepted by KVM) happens at which point FPU is granted to a guest.
KVM can check what mode CPU was in at this point and use this info
while saving FPU. But there is additional optimization that will prevent
this from working for all cases: when FPU is granted to a guest KVM
disabled CR0.TS/#NM intercepts, so guest is free to switch FPU from
32bit to 64bit mode without KVM knowing. Disabling this optimization
will make FP intensive workload slow in a guest.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-16 12:00 [PATCH, RFC] x86-64: properly handle FPU code/data selectors Jan Beulich
2013-10-16 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-16 15:36   ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-16 15:50     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-16 16:13       ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-16 18:43         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-17  7:09           ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  9:27         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-17  9:33           ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17  9:41             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-17  9:51               ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17 10:23                 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-10-17 10:37                   ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-17 10:39                     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-10-16 15:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-16 16:07   ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-16 17:13     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131017102354.GR15657@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox