From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@gmail.com>, Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-br@googlegroups.com, XFS FILESYSTEM <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix possible NULL dereference
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:44:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131021224459.GE16161@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5265956F.4010700@sandeen.net>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:58:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/21/13 1:32 PM, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> > This patch puts a 'break' in the true branch, avoiding the 'icptr->ic_next'
> > dereferencing.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Actually, NACK.
> Hm, yeah - cmn_err(CE_PANIC, " " ); used to BUG_ON, but the newer
> xfs_emerg() doesn't.
>
> Dave, was that intentional?
Of course it was. ;) xfs_emerg() is only called from the debug code
in xlog_verify_iclog(), xlog_verify_tail_lsn and assfail().
In the case of assfail(), it has it's own BUG() call, so it does
everything just fine.
In the case of xlog_verify_iclog() when icptr is NULL, it will
panic immediately after the message is printed, just like the old
code. i.e. this patch isn't fixing anything we need fixed.
> I wonder if there are more spots after xfs_emerg()'s which aren't
> defensive, because the code used to just panic there.
As for the rest of the calls in xlog_verify_iclog, they are checking
things that aren't immediately fatal, but indication that iclog
corruption has already occurred. It's debug code, so we could add
"panic immediately" code, but personally I'd prefer to see the error
message being printed and then have it continue like a production
system would so that we can see the types of crashes normal kernels
will see as a result of iclog memory corruption....
As for xlog_verify_tail_lsn(), that's an important informational
message indicating we might be leaking log space. It's not
immediately fatal, but if we see it and then have a log space
hang...
So, really, none of the callers really need xfs_emerg to panic like
CE_PANIC used to. The one case where it might be useful (i.e this
patch) we panic immediately anyway....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 18:32 [PATCH] xfs: fix possible NULL dereference Geyslan G. Bem
[not found] ` <5265956F.4010700@sandeen.net>
2013-10-21 22:44 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-10-21 23:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 23:18 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-21 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 0:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 10:12 ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
2013-10-22 20:39 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 20:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:03 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 21:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 22:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 22:33 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-25 9:15 ` Dave Jones
2013-10-23 10:58 ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
2013-10-23 20:34 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-23 20:53 ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
2013-10-30 20:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-31 15:55 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-31 16:15 ` Geyslan Gregório Bem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131021224459.GE16161@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=geyslan@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-br@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox