From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Arokux X <arokux@gmail.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
peter.chen@freescale.com, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: When USB PHY framework should be used?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:50:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131022105001.GQ3041@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPNxggbs6hJtPA+2kqg34D8kV73BdNft2kZdMhUKtsAD=SsCnA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1968 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:19:46PM +0200, Arokux X wrote:
> Dear Kishon,
>
> thank you for the answer, no problem it was late! Your understanding
> is almost correct.
>
> > From whatever I could understand, you have a USB HOST controller (each HOST
> > controller has an EHCI controller and a companion OHCI controller?). There are
> > separate clocks for each of EHCI and OHCI controller. EHCI and OHCI has
> > separate PHYs. Both these PHYs are fed by the same common clock. And you have a
> > separate reset bits for each of the PHYs.
>
> EHCI and OHCI have the same PHY. And this PHY has a reset bit. This is
> exactly what bothers me. Because there should be something central to
> both EHCI and OHCI which manages this reset bit, i.e. the bit should
> be cleared if and only if both EHCI and OHCI controllers are unloaded
> (as modules). I have done a nice picture of the hardware here, please
> take a look at it:
>
> http://linux-sunxi.org/User:Arokux#USB_Host_Hardware
>
> I've just realized that there is another commo thing for EHCI and OHCI
> - a GPIO which turns on the power to the USB_VBUS. The power should be
> supplied if at least one of the EHCI or OHCI is loaded. This again
> needs some central management.
>
> So to summarize, I have two things (reset bit and GPIO for the
> USB_VBUS) which are common to EHCI and OHCI and need to be managed
> outside of the EHCI/OHCI bus glue drivers. My exact question is: where
> this management should be done? Are there good examples in the kernel
> already?
It looks to me like all of these are just different registers of the
same controller. So to me, you should have a single driver for it, that
manages both the reset, regulators and clocks, and loads both the ohci
and ehci layers. bcma-hcd seems to be doing exactly that for example.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 19:21 When USB PHY framework should be used? Arokux X
2013-10-11 1:42 ` Peter Chen
2013-10-11 6:07 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-11 17:22 ` Arokux X
2013-10-12 1:19 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2013-10-12 10:07 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-14 18:17 ` Arokux X
2013-10-20 22:23 ` Arokux X
2013-10-21 9:02 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-21 11:19 ` Arokux X
2013-10-21 12:44 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-22 10:50 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131022105001.GQ3041@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arokux@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox