From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753036Ab3JVLzQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:55:16 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:50785 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752174Ab3JVLzP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:55:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:55:11 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] block: use a separate plug list for blk-mq requests Message-ID: <20131022115511.GJ14598@kernel.dk> References: <20131006160430.GA5959@infradead.org> <20131006181508.GF8252@kernel.dk> <20131022061657.GB25870@infradead.org> <20131022105106.GH14598@kernel.dk> <20131022114112.GA22171@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131022114112.GA22171@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 22 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21 2013, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > Thanks, I'll take a look at this. The plugging was done mostly hacky > > > > when implementing it, it was meant to be revisited. So definitely room > > > > for improvement there. > > > > > > Did you manage to take a look? > > > > Yep, just did on the flight. I think it looks pretty good and I want to > > queue it up. Did you test it? > > Yes, with my usual virtio-blk setup. Excellent, just wanted to be sure before I pushed anything out, since I can't test personally on the road... -- Jens Axboe