linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/ui/tui: don't force a refresh during progress update
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:34:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131025103432.GA4363@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382565562-15108-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>


* Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:

> Each call to tui_progress__update() would forcibly refresh the entire
> screen.  This is somewhat inefficient and causes noticable flickering
> during the startup of perf-report, especially on large/slow terminals.
> 
> It looks like the force-refresh in tui_progress__update() serves no
> purpose other than to clear the screen so that the progress bar of a
> previous operation does not subsume with that of a subsequent operation.
> But we can do just that in a much more efficient manner by clearing only
> the region that a previous progress bar may have occupied before
> repainting the new progress bar.  Then the force-refresh could be
> removed with no change in visuals.
> 
> This patch disables the slow force-refresh in tui_progress__update() and
> instead calls SLsmg_fill_region() on the entire area that the progress
> bar may occupy before repainting it.  This change makes the startup of
> perf-report much faster and appear much "smoother".
> 
> It turns out that this was a big bottleneck in the startup speed of
> perf-report -- with this patch, perf-report starts up ~1.6x faster (0.8s
> vs 0.5s) on my machines.  (These numbers were measured by running "time
> perf report" on an 8MB perf.data and pressing 'q' immediately.)
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c b/tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c
> index 6c2184d..641049a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/tui/progress.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,14 @@ static void tui_progress__update(u64 curr, u64 total, const char *title)
>  	if (total == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	ui__refresh_dimensions(true);
> +	ui__refresh_dimensions(false);
>  	pthread_mutex_lock(&ui__lock);
>  	y = SLtt_Screen_Rows / 2 - 2;
>  	SLsmg_set_color(0);
>  	SLsmg_draw_box(y, 0, 3, SLtt_Screen_Cols);
>  	SLsmg_gotorc(y++, 1);
>  	SLsmg_write_string((char *)title);
> +	SLsmg_fill_region(y, 1, 1, SLtt_Screen_Cols - 2, ' ');
>  	SLsmg_set_color(HE_COLORSET_SELECTED);
>  	bar = ((SLtt_Screen_Cols - 2) * curr) / total;
>  	SLsmg_fill_region(y, 1, 1, bar, ' ');

Nice! This is something I noticed as well, never figured out the 
root cause of it.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-25 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-23 21:59 [PATCH] perf/ui/tui: don't force a refresh during progress update Patrick Palka
2013-10-25 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-26  0:25 ` [PATCH rebase] " Patrick Palka
2013-10-28  5:52   ` Namhyung Kim
2013-11-12 21:54   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf ui tui progress: Don' t " tip-bot for Patrick Palka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131025103432.GA4363@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).