linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] percpu: remove this_cpu_xor()
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:04:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131027130415.GA30307@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382354737-59872-1-git-send-email-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> While optimizing and testing s390's this_cpu ops I realized that
> this_cpu_xor() generates broken code ("or" instead of "xor").
> 
> Since there is not a single user in the whole kernel tree it seems
> to be a good opportunity to simply remove it instead of fixing it.
> 
> These two patches only remove the generic and x86 variant. It doesn't
> touch s390 since it would only generate a merge conflict later on.
> I will take care of s390 anyway if the consensus is that it should be
> removed.
> 
> Heiko Carstens (2):
>   percpu: remove this_cpu_xor() implementation
>   x86: remove this_cpu_xor() implementation

Applied to percpu/for-3.13.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-27 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 11:25 [PATCH 0/2] percpu: remove this_cpu_xor() Heiko Carstens
2013-10-21 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu: remove this_cpu_xor() implementation Heiko Carstens
2013-10-21 14:59   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-21 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: " Heiko Carstens
2013-10-27 13:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131027130415.GA30307@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).