From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:29:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131027192911.GK18189@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526D5D0E.5090604@roeck-us.net>
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
> >>From: Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>
> >>
> >>The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> >>having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
> >>the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@flitspace.org.uk>
> >>---
> >>Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS.
> >>According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
> >
> >Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ?
> Did I get this wrong ?
Maintainer occasionally fumble it, so it's better when the patch submitter
also thinks about this. I can always change it when I disagree ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-27 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 16:13 [PATCH] INTEL DRM DRIVERS : No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 17:33 ` Greg KH
2013-10-27 18:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-27 18:29 ` Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 18:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-27 19:29 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-27 13:35 Rob Pearce
2013-10-27 13:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-27 16:06 ` Rob Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131027192911.GK18189@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rob@flitspace.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox