From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756648Ab3J1NFT (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:05:19 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:48268 "EHLO mail-la0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756293Ab3J1NFQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:05:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:05:11 +0100 From: Henrik Austad To: Jiri Kosina , Rob Landley Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Updating 00-INDEX in Documentation/* Message-ID: <20131028130511.GA6992@austad.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rob, Jiri If this email goes the wrong place, my sincere apologies, my asbestos=20 underwear can be quickly donned! I've been reading through some of the docs and one thing that has struct=20 me, is that there is a certain degree of bitrot (textrot?). Almost every=20 category has an outdated 00-INDEX. A couple of indexes has been updated=20 (thanks for applying Jiri!), but more remains. This is obviously not the most important job to undertake, but it=20 serves as a very convenient starting-point when exploring a given topic. Hacking away at python shows me that of the 254 subfolders 57 has outdated= =20 00-INDEX, either with missing files, or files that has been removed. (see= =20 list below) Now, I'm quite happy to start fixing this, but what I would like to know=20 before I start: - is it considered a waste of time? i.e. will it be worth the time - what is best, a single, big patch, or a series of one patch per=20 directory? - or should someone(tm) kick whoever caused 00-INDEX to be outdated, to fix= =20 it? thanks! List of filesystems with outdated index name of dir: (index_not_folder / in_folder_not_index) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) m68k: (0/1) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) blackfin: (0/2) ide: (1/1) fb: (3/3) networking: (3/12) scsi: (0/8) power: (1/2) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) arm: (10/7) RCU: (0/1) mmc: (4/0) fmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) timers: (0/3) devicetree: (5/1) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) fb: (3/3) power: (1/2) mmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) powerpc: (4/0) x86: (0/8) PCI: (1/1) isdn: (1/0) powerpc: (4/0) laptops: (1/2) vm: (4/7) virtual: (3/0) scheduler: (0/1) x86: (0/8) s390: (2/2) filesystems: (5/17) filesystems/nfs: (1/2) arm: (10/7) serial: (1/2) leds: (0/4) arm: (10/7) fb: (3/3) power: (1/2) mmc: (4/0) w1: (2/0) w1/masters: (1/2) w1/slaves: (0/1) powerpc: (4/0) x86: (0/8) --=20 Henrik Austad --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJuYQcACgkQ6k5VT6v45llQ8ACbBAj7fVG6Zifo0JgwmzEGmUmM 5l8AoOMX2pkGy48dJG44Ihjs9J7pc8Zo =0dAq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--