public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, youquan.song@intel.com, riel@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 02:51:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131029095135.GH4126@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383036537-30362-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:48:56PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> In some cases, nohz enable status needs to be checked. E.G, in RCU and cpufreq
> ondemand governor. So add tick_nohz_check() to return tick_nohz_enabled value
> And use tick_nohz_check() instead of referencing tick_nohz_enabled in the rcutree_plugin.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>

NACK on the rcutree change unless you put the ACCESS_ONCE() in.

Or is there some reason that ACCESS_ONCE() is not needed?  If so, what
is that reason?

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  include/linux/tick.h     | 2 ++
>  kernel/rcutree_plugin.h  | 4 +---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 8 +++++++-
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 5128d33..a9c5374 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static inline int tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void)
>  extern void tick_nohz_idle_enter(void);
>  extern void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void);
>  extern void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void);
> +extern int tick_nohz_check(void);
>  extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void);
>  extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
>  extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
> @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
> 
>  	return len;
>  }
> +static inline int tick_nohz_check(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
>  static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
>  # endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 130c97b..af167ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -1627,8 +1627,6 @@ module_param(rcu_idle_gp_delay, int, 0644);
>  static int rcu_idle_lazy_gp_delay = RCU_IDLE_LAZY_GP_DELAY;
>  module_param(rcu_idle_lazy_gp_delay, int, 0644);
> 
> -extern int tick_nohz_enabled;
> -
>  /*
>   * Try to advance callbacks for all flavors of RCU on the current CPU.
>   * Afterwards, if there are any callbacks ready for immediate invocation,
> @@ -1718,7 +1716,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
>  	int tne;
> 
>  	/* Handle nohz enablement switches conservatively. */
> -	tne = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_nohz_enabled);
> +	tne = tick_nohz_check();
>  	if (tne != rdtp->tick_nohz_enabled_snap) {
>  		if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu, NULL))
>  			invoke_rcu_core(); /* force nohz to see update. */
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 3612fc7..d381a22 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,13 @@ void __init tick_nohz_init(void)
>  /*
>   * NO HZ enabled ?
>   */
> -int tick_nohz_enabled __read_mostly  = 1;
> +static int tick_nohz_enabled __read_mostly  = 1;
> +
> +int tick_nohz_check(void)
> +{
> +	return	tick_nohz_enabled;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_check);
> 
>  /*
>   * Enable / Disable tickless mode
> -- 
> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-29  8:48 [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Lan Tianyu
2013-10-29  8:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] Cpufreq/gov: use tick_nohz_check() to check idle micro accouting support Lan Tianyu
2013-10-29  9:51 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-10-29 10:29   ` [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Lan Tianyu
2013-11-04  3:13     ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-04  9:52       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-05  0:42         ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15  8:35 ` [PATCH V2 " Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15  8:35   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] Cpufreq/gov: use tick_nohz_check() to check idle micro accouting support Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 10:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-15 10:35   ` [PATCH V2 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Viresh Kumar
2013-11-15 11:06   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131029095135.GH4126@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox