Re: [PATCH 01/12] sb_edac: move PCI IDs to pci_ids.h

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>]

Em Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:40:20 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> escreveu:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:26:55PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > According to the comment, it should be done before submitting upstream.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/edac/sb_edac.c  |   21 ++-------------------
> >  include/linux/pci_ids.h |   11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > index e04462b..4cdd948 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> > @@ -57,26 +57,9 @@ static int probed;
> >   */
> >  
> >  /*
> > - * FIXME: For now, let's order by device function, as it makes
> > - * easier for driver's development process. This table should be
> > - * moved to pci_id.h when submitted upstream
> 
> Why, is anything else besides sb_edac.c using those?
> 
I think that this patch makes sense, as the other Sandy Bridge registers
are at pci_ids.h. So, it is a matter of consistency.

Also, I won't doubt that other drivers could need to access those, as
there are other things there on a few of those PCI IDs.

Yet, on patch 12/12, you're adding the Ivy Bridge specific PCI IDs
inside the driver.

So, IMHO, you should either move all to pci_ids.h or to keep them inside
the driver.

My personal taste would be to move them all to pci_ids.h.

Regards,
Mauro