public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] events: add a flag to perf_event_open() to set O_CLOEXEC
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:12:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031181202.GA19466@laptop.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383168950-8933-1-git-send-email-ydroneaud@opteya.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:35:50PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> This patch adds PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC flag for
> perf_event_open() syscall.
> 
> perf_event_open() creates a new file descriptor,
> but unlike open() syscall, it lack a flag to atomicaly
> set close-on-exec (O_CLOEXEC).
> 
> Not using O_CLOEXEC by default and not letting userspace
> provide the "open" flags should be avoided: in most case
> O_CLOEXEC must be used to not leak file descriptor across
> exec().
> 
> Using O_CLOEXEC when creating a file descriptor allows
> userspace to set latter, using fcntl(), without any risk
> of race, if the file descriptor is going to be inherited
> or not across exec().
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/94b641a81a06ba4943cf77e80bc271c8@meuh.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1383121137.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
> Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> This patch should replaces
> "[PATCH v4 6/7] events: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()"
> 
> Please have a look.

I'm still terminally confused as to all of this... Why does it matter
what the default is if you can change it with fcntl() ? Also, how can
you tell nobody relies on the current behaviour and its therefore safe
to change?



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-31 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-30 19:47 [PATCH v4 0/7] Getting rid of get_unused_fd() Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ia64: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ppc/cell: " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] binfmt_misc: " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] file: " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] fanotify: " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] events: " Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 20:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-30 21:18     ` Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 21:35       ` [PATCH] events: add a flag to perf_event_open() to set O_CLOEXEC Yann Droneaud
2013-10-31 18:12         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-11-04 15:05           ` Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 22:00       ` [PATCH v4 6/7] events: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd() Yann Droneaud
2013-10-30 19:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] file: remove get_unused_fd() macro Yann Droneaud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131031181202.GA19466@laptop.lan \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox