From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/rmap: per anon_vma lock
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:07:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131101100707.GB30123@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANN689HQUv=k4AiD+v3980AmgPXbtcs1HLD7Ec1y8dsOfa_emA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:22:25AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > AFAICT this isn't correct at all. We used to protect the vma interval
> > tree with the root lock, now we don't. All we've got left is the
> > mmap_sem, but anon_vma chains can cross address-spaces and thus we're up
> > some creek without no paddle.
>
> Yes, that was my first thought as well (though I wanted to double
> check at first).
>
> I also want to point out that lately we've seen several changes sent
> out that relax locking with no accompanying explanation of why the
> relaxed locking would be safe. Please don't do that - having a lot of
> performance data is worthless if you can't explain why the new locking
> is safe.
Agreed.
> And I'm not asking to prove a negative ('lack of any possible
> races') there, but at least in this case one could dig out why the
> root anon vma locking was introduced and if they think that this
> reason doesn't apply anymore, explain why...
It was introduced by commit 2b575eb6(And, BTW, I'm sorry that this commit log
about bb4aa39676f is wrong)
commit 2b575eb64f7a9c701fb4bfdb12388ac547f6c2b6
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Tue May 24 17:12:11 2011 -0700
mm: convert anon_vma->lock to a mutex
Straightforward conversion of anon_vma->lock to a mutex.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As you can see, Peter didn't tell why before. Honestly speaking, that
was my originaly concern as well. I tried to find some possible races;
I guess I may miss something.
Thanks.
--yliu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-01 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-01 7:54 [PATCH 0/4] per anon_vma lock and turn anon_vma rwsem lock to rwlock_t Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/rmap: per anon_vma lock Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-01 9:22 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-01 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-01 10:07 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2013-11-01 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-01 11:44 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-01 14:02 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 9:38 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-01 14:09 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-01 7:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/rmap: convert anon_vma rwsem to rwlock_t Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-01 7:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/rmap: cleanup unnecessary code Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 7:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/rmap.c: move anon_vma initialization code into anon_vma_ctor Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-04 3:37 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 8:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] per anon_vma lock and turn anon_vma rwsem lock to rwlock_t Ingo Molnar
2013-11-01 8:11 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 8:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-01 10:16 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-02 3:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-11-04 3:59 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-05 1:44 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-05 2:03 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-05 3:41 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-05 3:10 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-05 14:43 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-11-01 17:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-11-01 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-01 18:47 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-01 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-02 3:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-11-01 19:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131101100707.GB30123@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox