From: andreas.thalhammer@linux.com
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Topic closed] A Desktop Linux idea: modulized open hardware database for the linux kernel config
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201311032303.16938.andreas.thalhammer@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131103200227.GC7376@thunk.org>
Theodore Ts'o wrote on Sunday, 03rd November 2013:
> It's an idea that people have tossed around before, but utltimately,
> it's far more work than it's worth, and it's a maintenance nightmare.
> For most non-technical users, using a distro kernel is quite good
> enough.
Yes, I get it. Thanks for the honesty.
> > I’m sorry, but I cannot possibly do this all by myself. I was able
> > to help in some Wikis and in Smolt, but I cannot setup such a
> > system. Apparently I was only able to come up with the idea...
>
> If you told me that you wanted to try it, I would tell you that you
> were going to be getting into a huge amount of work, and it's not
> obvious to me that it's worth it --- but if you are going to volunteer
> your own time, then it's ultimately up to you. But having you trying
> to volunteer *other* people's time for what might be a sisyphean does
> take a fair amount of chutzpah.
I don’t want other people to volunteer, I was expressing an idea, but – after
reading your answer – I do understand that the gain is not worth the effort. At
least now I know what you (the people making Linux) think about it.
I was trying to off-load some workload from you (developers) to power-users. I
consider myself to be good enough to compile a kernel by myself, and to
install Gentoo for that matter, and I’m also willing to volunteer some of my
spare time to help other people who run Linux. I wrote some Wiki entries on
how to install Linux on a specific machine and how to get things to run. I
found that most of the times a new kernel was required due to some devices
requireing a staging driver or a deactivated feature of a driver.
However, my possibilities are limited. As I wrote before, I tried some tools
(written by others!) that unfortunately didn’t work out, like Smolt.
So I’ll let go of that idea. I’m certainly glad to have proposed it, but I get
it that it isn’t worth it.
I don’t think it has anything to do with chutzpah though, since the posting
was motivated by me being eager to help where I can, not where I cannot.
(Although I do understand it may look different.)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-03 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-03 14:53 A Desktop Linux idea: modulized open hardware database for the linux kernel config andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 16:18 ` Aldo Iljazi
2013-11-03 16:43 ` andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 17:42 ` el_es
2013-11-03 18:53 ` andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 18:57 ` Re for el_es: " andreas.thalhammer
2013-11-03 20:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-11-03 22:03 ` andreas.thalhammer [this message]
2013-11-12 22:13 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201311032303.16938.andreas.thalhammer@linux.com \
--to=andreas.thalhammer@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox