From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753802Ab3KDPUO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:20:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11672 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753167Ab3KDPUN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:20:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:20:02 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Jens Axboe , Kent Overstreet , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] dm: fix missing bi_remaining accounting Message-ID: <20131104152001.GA12398@redhat.com> References: <20131101135931.GA22903@redhat.com> <5273C2B8.5030608@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 10:06am -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On 11/01/2013 07:59 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > Add the missing bi_remaining increment, required by the block layer's > > > new bio-chaining code, to both the verity and old snapshot DM targets. > > > > > > Otherwise users will hit the bi_remaining <= 0 BUG_ON in bio_endio(). > > > > Thanks Mike, added to the mix. > > > > -- > > Jens Axboe > > Hi > > This improves a little bit on the previous patch, by replacing costly > atomic_inc with cheap atomic_set. > > > From: Mikulas Patocka > > dm: change atomic_inc to atomic_set(1) > > There are places in dm where we save bi_endio and bi_private, set them to > target's routine, submit the bio, from the target's bi_endio routine we > restore bi_endio and bi_private and end the bio with bi_endio. > > This causes underflow of bi_remaining, so we must restore bi_remaining > before ending the bio from the target bi_endio routine. > > The code uses atomic_inc for restoration of bi_remaining. This patch > changes it to atomic_set(1) to avoid an interlocked instruction. In the > target's bi_endio routine we are sure that bi_remaining is zero > (otherwise, the bi_endio routine wouldn't be called) and there are no > concurrent users of the bio, so we can replace atomic_inc with > atomic_set(1). This isn't DM-specific. Shouldn't the other places in the tree that use atomic_inc on bi_remaining should really be converted at the same time?