From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the device-mapper tree
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:20:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131105032054.GA19421@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105135128.496b8b2f599d11f2d30ad70c@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 9:51pm -0500,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the device-mapper tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c: In function 'bio_writes_complete_block':
> drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c:1020:7: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size'
> (bio->bi_size == (cache->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT));
> ^
>
> Caused by commit 1bd270d800ec ("dm cache: promotion optimisation for
> writes") interacting with commit ed2d2f9a8265 ("block: Abstract out bvec
> iterator") from the block tree.
>
> I applied this fix up patch and can carry it as necessary:
Hi Stephen,
Yes that is needed, as is this (which begs the question: how should I be
handling the fact that post-merge changes are needed? Especially since
Linus will need the changes too):
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
index a977d5c..52d7d75 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ static void dm_unhook_bio(struct dm_hook_info *h, struct bio *bio)
{
bio->bi_end_io = h->bi_end_io;
bio->bi_private = h->bi_private;
+
+ /*
+ * Must bump bi_remaining to allow bio to complete with
+ * restored bi_end_io.
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&bio->bi_remaining);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -746,12 +752,6 @@ static void writethrough_endio(struct bio *bio, int err)
dm_unhook_bio(&pb->hook_info, bio);
- /*
- * Must bump bi_remaining to allow bio to complete with
- * restored bi_end_io.
- */
- atomic_inc(&bio->bi_remaining);
-
if (err) {
bio_endio(bio, err);
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 2:51 linux-next: build failure after merge of the device-mapper tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-05 3:20 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-11-05 3:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-05 12:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-05 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-05 22:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-05 22:44 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-15 3:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-15 8:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-08-15 15:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-04-10 2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07 3:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07 3:54 ` Matthew Sakai
2024-02-07 15:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2023-09-15 0:06 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-23 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-23 16:47 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2021-02-11 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-11 14:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-04-22 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-06 6:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-06 13:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-12-06 20:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-31 4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-31 4:35 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-31 4:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-31 12:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-05-31 14:20 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-31 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-31 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-31 21:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-27 2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-27 15:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-06-19 2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-09 3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-09 4:28 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-06-09 11:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-03-04 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-04 3:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-01 10:43 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01 13:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-05 23:27 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-22 3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-22 12:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-22 13:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-22 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2014-01-15 3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-15 4:30 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-02 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-02 6:44 ` Milan Broz
2010-08-02 11:34 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-06-30 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131105032054.GA19421@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox