From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf hists: Consolidate __hists__add_*entry()
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:42:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131106134210.GA2711@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105215243.GA8303@sdfg.com.ar>
Em Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:52:43PM +0000, Rodrigo Campos escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:09:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > @@ -486,15 +425,15 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct hists *hists,
> > .stat = {
> > - .period = period,
> > .nr_events = 1,
> > + .period = period,
> > .weight = weight,
> > },
> Isn't this seems unrelated and unneeded ?
> The "period" field is before the "nr_events" field in the struct, so maybe is
> more clear to leave it as it was ? The actual relative order (it has some more
> fields) in the struct is: period, weigth, nr_events. Might be better if they
> match that order here ? Although not sure since we are using the fields with
> name and is clear enough.
Yeah, this shouldn't be there, I thought about fixing this up to reduce
the patch size, but ended up being lenient.
Namhyung, please avoid such unneeded patch churn :-)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 20:09 [GIT PULL 00/10] perf/core improvements and fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf hists: Consolidate __hists__add_*entry() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 21:52 ` Rodrigo Campos
2013-11-06 8:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-11-06 8:28 ` Rodrigo Campos
2013-11-06 13:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2013-11-07 6:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf kvm: Disable live command if timerfd is not supported Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 03/10] tools/perf/build: Fix detection of non-core features Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf list: Remove a level of indentation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf list: Add usage Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf tools: Factor sysfs code into generic fs object Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf fs: Rename NAME_find_mountpoint() to NAME__mountpoint() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf fs: Add procfs support Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf tools: Check maximum frequency rate for record/top Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-05 20:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf tools: Finish the removal of 'self' arguments Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-06 5:31 ` [GIT PULL 00/10] perf/core improvements and fixes Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131106134210.GA2711@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).