From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] panic: improve panic_timeout calculation
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:32:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131111153206.GA22113@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131111135216.GB8781@gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
>
> Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse, argumentative and needlessly
> confrontative - that's not 'constructive'.
Felipe, remember when on the Git list Junio said he would stop trying
to respond to any patches that had problems because you couldn't
respond constructively to feedback, and you claimed that you had no
problems working with other folks, including on the Linux Kernel
mailing list?
You might want to take this feedback and consider whether the problem
may be with *you*, and your user interface, and not with other folks
like Ingo and Junio. You clearly want to contribute to both projects,
and we can always use more skilled hackers. But part of being a good
hacker is being able to play well with others.
Best regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 0:46 [PATCH 0/3] panic: improvements Felipe Contreras
2013-11-08 0:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] panic: setup panic_timeout early Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 13:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 14:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 14:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-08 0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] panic: improve panic_timeout calculation Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 11:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 12:44 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 12:54 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 13:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 13:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 15:32 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-11-11 15:59 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-13 0:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-08 0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] panic: enable local IRQs for restart timeout too Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 13:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-11-11 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 14:40 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131111153206.GA22113@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox