From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754868Ab3KKRUk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:20:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:32817 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753173Ab3KKRUd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:20:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:20:29 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Warning: NO_HZ FULL will not work with unstable sched clock Message-ID: <20131111172028.GF26853@localhost.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 12:32:06PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > Hi, > It first appeared some time after 3.9 or 3.10 and still persist. > I guess bisect is not required? > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:187 > can_stop_full_tick+0x8d/0x9a() > NO_HZ FULL will not work with unstable sched clock Right, it's not a bug, just a warning we've put to make sure that users of full dynticks are aware of limitations when the sched clock is unstable. That's something we want to fix in the long run as it seems that quite a lot of people have unstable tsc. Thanks.