From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:15:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131111211530.GA19316@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131111122537.5c3192d2@gandalf.local.home>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
> >
> > OK, I'll do. :)
> > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me
> > to post the series, linux-arch?
>
> I would add linux-arch.
>
> Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as
> new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in
> LKML).
We'd rather like to know about all cases where new code is added to
kprobes (or where we missed to consider some existing code).
It's really just a handful of annotations, the brunt of which is internal
to kprobes.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 12:52 [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-08 12:52 ` [PATCH -tip RFC 1/2] kprobes: Prohibit probing on .entry.text code Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-08 12:52 ` [PATCH -tip RFC 2/2] kprobes: Introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for blacklist Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 11:16 ` [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 17:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 17:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-11 21:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131111211530.GA19316@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).