public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:16:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113151655.GG28033@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131113144353.GE28033@fieldses.org>

(Argh, sorry, with the right stable address cc'd this time I hope.)

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:10:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, not taking ->i_lock there definitely looks like a good thing.  As for
> 64bit ->i_ino itself...  Looks like the main problem is the shitload of
> printks - the actual uses of ->i_ino are fine, but these suckers create
> a lot of noise.  So for now I'm going with Bruce's variant; 64bit i_ino
> doesn't look too bad (even on i386, actually), but it'll have to wait
> until 3.14.  Too noisy and late in this cycle...

I believe we also want that in stable?

950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb "exportfs: fix 32-bit nfsd
handling of 64-bit inode numbers"

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-03  1:58 [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final Al Viro
2013-11-03 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-03 19:54   ` Al Viro
2013-11-03 23:39     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-04  0:53       ` Al Viro
2013-11-06 15:10         ` Al Viro
2013-11-13 14:43           ` Bruce Fields
2013-11-13 15:16             ` Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-11-18 16:32               ` Greg KH
2013-12-18 19:40                 ` Bruce Fields
2013-12-18 20:12                   ` Greg KH
2013-11-04 22:30       ` Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131113151655.GG28033@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox