From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753414Ab3KNMN7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:13:59 -0500
Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:36723 "EHLO
	mail-bk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752624Ab3KNMNz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:13:55 -0500
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:13:50 +0100
From: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@men.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mpc85xx_edac changes for 3.13
Message-ID: <20131114121350.GT7429@rric.localhost>
References: <20131112161901.GA15637@jtlinux>
 <CA+55aFzJhyo8bKBchYq0Q=rwPv_-v-xWgOKWxKBcSBycMZcmTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131114054750.GA27791@kroah.com>
 <20131114092009.GA4960@pd.tnic>
 <20131114091843.4bb72afc@samsung.com>
 <20131114112418.GH4960@pd.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131114112418.GH4960@pd.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 14.11.13 12:24:18, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:18:43AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > So, in practice, Borislav was working as a maintainer for amd64 EDAC
> > patches, and I working mainly as Intel EDAC maintainer. The (few)
> > other arm EDAC patches were either coming via my tree or via Boris
> > tree, depending on who got them first.
> 
> Yeah, and I think this has worked pretty good in the past so if you want
> to, we can continue the same thing of sharing the load on EDAC patches
> and we both do interim maintainers until Doug steps in.
> 
> And since it won't change any workflow for Linus, he's probably fine
> with it too.
> 
> Yes, no? Comments?

There will be some upcomming arm/arm64 specific changes which might
effect also the core driver in the future. I would be willing to
collect and send these ones upstream in coordination with you.

Thanks,

-Robert