From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753996Ab3KNOVl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:21:41 -0500 Received: from mail1.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.116]:8136 "EHLO mail1.bemta14.messagelabs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753293Ab3KNOVf (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:21:35 -0500 X-Env-Sender: Johannes.Thumshirn@men.de X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-194.messagelabs.com!1384438891!9325988!1 X-Originating-IP: [80.255.6.145] X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.13; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked X-PGP-Universal: processed; by keys.men.de on Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:21:32 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:21:25 +0100 From: Johannes Thumshirn To: Borislav Petkov CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Doug Thompson , Johannes Thumshirn , Robert Richter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , , Aristeu Rozanski Filho Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mpc85xx_edac changes for 3.13 Message-ID: <20131114142125.GA29214@jtlinux> References: <20131112161901.GA15637@jtlinux> <20131114054750.GA27791@kroah.com> <20131114092009.GA4960@pd.tnic> <20131114091843.4bb72afc@samsung.com> <20131114112418.GH4960@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131114112418.GH4960@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: [192.1.1.31] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2013 14:21:31.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0607090:01CEE144] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:24:18PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:18:43AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > So, in practice, Borislav was working as a maintainer for amd64 EDAC > > patches, and I working mainly as Intel EDAC maintainer. The (few) > > other arm EDAC patches were either coming via my tree or via Boris > > tree, depending on who got them first. > > Yeah, and I think this has worked pretty good in the past so if you want > to, we can continue the same thing of sharing the load on EDAC patches > and we both do interim maintainers until Doug steps in. > > And since it won't change any workflow for Linus, he's probably fine > with it too. > > Yes, no? Comments? OK for me. For the MPC85xx EDAC I'll do the testing then and either Borislav or Mauro send them upstream. Regards, Johannes