From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: /proc/vmcore mmap() failure issue
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:13:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114151359.GA3913@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5284A689.70903@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:31:37PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> BTW, I previously found a part of makedumpfile that truncates the first and
> last pages if they are not aligned in page size. Discussing with Kumagai-san,
> the truncation is performed on some ia64 system and he found a valid data in
> the truncated area, and the latest makedumpfile no longer does such
> truncation.
I went through the mail thread link you posted below. Looks like
bootloader had put command line in that area and that would be truncated
if we exclude partial pages from vmcore.
I don't know about IA64, but on x86, I see that we are trimming partial
pages before they are added to memblock. So any memory allocations after
this should not happen in partial page area. Bootloader still might
place some things in those partial pages I guess.
So do we care about that little bootloader data if it happens to be
there. Dump mechanism works only after kdump service has been loaded.
That means first kernel is up and running. That means any relevant
data passed to us from bootloader has already been copied in kernel
memory and kernel did not crash. So to me, we don't have a strong
need to look at exactly how bootloader passed data looked originally.
We can just look at kernel copy of associated data structures (bootparams,
command line etc).
I think being able to mmap() vmcore is much more important. BTW, is
it possible to change makedumpfile so that it uses mmap() for reading
page aligned areas and falls back to read() interface for reading
partial pages? (Though it is beginning to sound already complicatated
to me).
Given the fact that hpa does not like fixing it in kernel. We are left
with option of fixing it in following places.
- Drop partial pages in kexec-tools
- Drop partial pages in makeudmpfile.
- Read partial pages using read() interface in makedumpfile
- Modify /proc/vmcore to copy partial pages in second kernel's memory.
It is not clear to me that partial pages are really useful. So I want
to avoid modifying /proc/vmcore to deal with partial pages and increase
complexity.
So fixing makedumpfile (either option2 or option 3) seems least risky
to me. In fact I would say let us keep it simple and truncate partial
pages in makedumpfile to keep it simple. And look at option 3 once we
have a strong use case for partial pages.
What do you think?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 20:41 /proc/vmcore mmap() failure issue Vivek Goyal
2013-11-13 21:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-13 21:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-13 22:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-13 22:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-13 23:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-13 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-14 10:31 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-14 15:13 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-11-15 9:41 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-15 14:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-18 0:51 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-18 13:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 5:29 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-20 14:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 5:00 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-21 8:31 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-21 16:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-25 8:10 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-25 9:01 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-25 14:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-26 1:51 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-26 5:16 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-19 9:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-20 5:27 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-20 6:43 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-26 1:52 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-21 7:14 ` chaowang
2013-11-25 8:09 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2013-11-26 3:29 ` chaowang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131114151359.GA3913@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).