From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753604Ab3KPBVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:21:30 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:42683 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752645Ab3KPBVX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:21:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:21:16 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/28] rcutorture: Add KVM-based test framework Message-ID: <20131116012116.GZ4138@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20131116003517.GA31563@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1384562141-32446-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20131116010528.GA9112@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131116010528.GA9112@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13111601-3532-0000-0000-000003114CFB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:05:28PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" > > > > This commit adds the test framework that I used to test RCU under KVM. > > This consists of a group of scripts and Kconfig fragments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > Cc: Greg KH > > Yeah! Thanks for following through on this, it will help me out a lot > in testing stable kernels. Glad you like it! ;-) > Oh, one very minor comment on the patches, you should delete the address > of the FSF from your file headers, unless you want to track the office > movements of them for the next 40+ years. We've been removing them from > kernel code where we notice them, as half of them are wrong, and I don't > want to have to go back and fix them again when they move again. I had no idea that they tend to move! Thank you, I will remove them. Thanx, Paul