From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752951Ab3KPSYD (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:24:03 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:47745 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752443Ab3KPSX7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:23:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:23:28 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Frank Becker Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13 Message-ID: <20131116182328.GJ18306@pd.tnic> References: <20131110122638.GA17775@pd.tnic> <20131116100649.GB18306@pd.tnic> <20131116111227.GD18306@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:10:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ahh. Yes. Googling for "hetzner online spam", and there's a *lot* of > complaints. See for example > > http://www.spamrankings.net/rankv2/2013/09/01/monthly/world/volume/cbl/all/regular/ Yowza, this is just great! :-( > which puts it #2 _worldwide_ in September. I have no idea how accurate > that is, but.. And they were #3 in August. So a steady rise ... > I would suggest everybody who uses hetzner actively drop them, and > talk publicly about *why* they drop them. Your business may not be all > that lucrative to them (compared to the spam), but still.. Yeah, I hear they're not that great otherwise either, regardless of how they handle (or not) spam. @Frank, we need to have a serious talk, you and I :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --