From: Frank Becker <fb@alien8.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:22:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131117012215.GA10439@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxZcNfOEadD7EixNf5YZJVLTJ=2T4TOybWfwTP71KnuRg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1368 bytes --]
Linus Torvalds [2013-11-17, 00:52 +0100]:
> On Nov 16, 2013 3:34 PM, "Frank Becker" <fb@alien8.de> wrote:
Hi,
> > Blaming the server provider is nonsense.
>
> BS.
:-) Looks like an authentic mail. Who needs crypto-signatures?
> If the service provider allows spammers, the service provider is shit. It
> really I'd that simple.
It isn't black/white and you probably know. E-mail is broken by design. Any
attempt to fix it has failed so far. It is abused.
I don't defend Hetzner here. Yes, if they made it to be ranked #2 SPAMer on
some Web page they have a problem especially considering the fact that they
are not #2 in size. I'll tell them that other customers run into a SPAM
problem if they don't mitigate that.
Still, Google made a mistake by tagging Boris mail as SPAM. As you already
wrote it probably was triggered by the content filter. They don't tell. To
get those filters right is probably impossible. BTW, I liked your idea to
tag propaganda you mentioned in some interview.
I'll leave it to this. I've wasted way too much life-time on anti-spam measures
already just because I'd like to run my own mail server and can read e-mail
without other SPAM^h^h ads around it.
The real problem are those fucking parasites aka SPAMers. May they rot in hell.
Bye,
Frank
--
Frank Becker <fb@alien8.de> (jabber|mail)
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 238 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-17 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-10 12:26 [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13 Borislav Petkov
2013-11-16 2:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-16 10:06 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxHO9035t=CiNTRX1XK5KSxzh8HfZ3Kaspsm6yfs2O=8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-16 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-16 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-16 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-16 23:34 ` Frank Becker
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxZcNfOEadD7EixNf5YZJVLTJ=2T4TOybWfwTP71KnuRg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-17 1:22 ` Frank Becker [this message]
2013-11-17 7:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-16 10:29 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131117012215.GA10439@alien8.de \
--to=fb@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox