From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751521Ab3KRO2V (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:28:21 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]:49652 "EHLO mail-ob0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243Ab3KRO2P (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:28:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:28:11 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd_cell where possible Message-ID: <20131118142811.GK13640@lee--X1> References: <1384779449-1888-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20131118130616.GI13640@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > In the interests of bisectability and revertability, I'd prefer one > > patch per file-change where possible please. Or at the very least in > > groups of files, so one for tps*, another one for max*, etc. > > Done. More SoB-credits for me ;-) You're welcome. :) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog