From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752692Ab3KSTM7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:12:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:55000 "EHLO mail-ee0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751821Ab3KSTM5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:12:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:12:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Russell King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, voice.shen@atmel.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched_clock: Document 4Mhz vs 1Mhz decision Message-ID: <20131119191254.GA22311@gmail.com> References: <20131119184248.GA27599@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131119184248.GA27599@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:12:23AM -0800, tip-bot for Stephen Boyd wrote: > > + /* > > + * Use 4MHz instead of 1MHz so that things like 1.832Mhz show as > > + * 1832Khz > > How about getting proper SI units. Note that I objected to this patch earlier today, I think this code should look differently - so your objection to this particular patch is mooted. Thanks, Ingo