Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage

Jacob Pan
2013-11-20T17:19:27Z

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:34:53 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I ran head-first into intel_powerclamp and acpi_pad yesterday --
> > afaict they try and do pretty much the same thing but both had
> > competing sets of bugs and issues.
> >
> > Related to that I went over the tree looking for
> > preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse.
> >
> > I know that patch 3 isn't going to be popular with Arjan but you
> > guys are going to have to make that work. That stuff is hideously
> > terrible.
> >
> > A note to Zhang Rui, _never_ merge EXPORTs in another maintainers'
> > guts without an explicit ACK from him, Thomas was quite horrified
> > when I asked him how tick_nohz_idle_{enter,exit} got exported.
> >
> > That said, thanks for a 'fun' two days :-(
>
> s/vaux/faux/ .. its been a long day.. and there's far too many dead
> email addresses @intel.com
Hi Peter,
I cannot cleanly apply the patch set on upstream kernel. Failed on
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] preempt, locking: Rework local_bh_{dis,en}able()

Can you tell me which commit id should I do git am?

Thanks,

Jacob