From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754105Ab3KTPqp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:46:45 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:58309 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754006Ab3KTPqo (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:46:44 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mtd: nand: davinci: extend description of bindings Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:46:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk , Santosh Shilimkar , Rob Landley , Russell King , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <1384960945-14528-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <1384960945-14528-7-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <1384960945-14528-7-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201311201646.21435.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:n3zYvlMhIufRJFVaKzYdetgrhKYR3ekt8hHU63N7ypr k6s+yb5PbWfQ/e9DSd61ZIFue6/cU5Jm/ce+GMwAd7kEfUMzb/ +GPXg0nnMI4/SCCd4hPmM1fK0wF3hcsK7Z6Rwa6p+fnl7D5YQ3 idPqbS3m1YjkiehVQdaccgofV1oLcs14SJKfWIP69akysqOD2f oXGq9vWy8shSubIcJgpJDkqRmHyVBUhWdK1+5D9XZPoq9J3a56 103kiwd2nQ4xlkXURyU4Q7tCbSFRBVh+leEWeSIC9fKDI0gaQu UCBs3mc4zRqU/priBxw/rtzy0Cha5ZqKFUXM0+TO+9sBr/Lvbx L40D+EqyMOydv7Dtrb6w= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 20 November 2013, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > Extend bindings for davinci_nand driver to be more clear. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt | 77 ++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) Hi Ivan, The changes look good to me, but please clarify in the changeset description above whether this is a backwards-compatible change, a clarification without semantic changes, or an incompatible change (which should be avoided). Arnd