From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Move fs.* to generic lib/lk/
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:17:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131121111744.GA27513@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131121100722.GA25459@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:34:10AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ouch, the naming is horrible, what does 'lk' stand for?
>
> "linux kernel" :-)
>
> > Please rename it to something sensible before it spreads.
> >
> > libkernel.so and tools/lib/kernel/ would be perfect I think.
>
> However, now that I think of it, the naming is kinda imprecise
> having only "kernel" in it - it only denotes that it is a library of
> stuff that has grown in the kernel.
>
> So how about
>
> tools/lib/ktools/
> tools/lib/kutils/
> tools/lib/kernel-tools/
> tools/lib/kernel-utils/
> ...
>
> and
>
> libktools.so
> libkutils.so
> ...
>
> ?
>
> I'd prefer ktools as in the tools/ directory of the kernel repo.
So what does each name mean, what would they be used for and what's
the difference between them?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 21:56 [PATCH] perf: Move fs.* to generic lib/lk/ Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-21 10:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-11-21 11:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 11:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-21 12:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 12:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-21 13:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 13:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-21 14:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 15:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-21 15:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-21 15:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 17:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-21 19:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-22 12:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-22 13:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-22 15:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-22 15:20 ` David Ahern
2013-11-22 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-22 15:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-23 13:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-26 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-27 15:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-23 13:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-26 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-27 15:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-28 12:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-12-02 20:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-22 14:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-11-22 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131121111744.GA27513@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox