From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756156Ab3KWRTk (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:19:40 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34460 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755517Ab3KWRTj (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:19:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:20:10 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Alan Stern , Sarah Sharp , Lan Tianyu , Xenia Ragiadakou , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: avoid possible division by zero Message-ID: <20131123172010.GA8018@kroah.com> References: <1385224294-15461-1-git-send-email-morbidrsa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385224294-15461-1-git-send-email-morbidrsa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:31:34PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Avoid possible division by zero in led_work, if hdev->maxchild is 0. > > See also: > http://buildbot.llvm.linuxfoundation.org/checker/scan-build-latest/report-b65939.html#EndPath > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn > --- > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > index a7c04e2..8c7aa4e 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static void led_work (struct work_struct *work) > unsigned changed = 0; > int cursor = -1; > > - if (hdev->state != USB_STATE_CONFIGURED || hub->quiescing) > + if (hdev->state != USB_STATE_CONFIGURED || hub->quiescing > + || hdev->maxchild == 0) And how can maxchild ever be equal to 0? Look at where it is assigned (it comes from bNbrPorts in the descriptor), in hub_configure() and if it is set to 0, the creation of the structure fails and then this code will never run, right? So I don't think this is needed, and your checker needs to be fixed. sorry, greg k-h